The two-week old crisis is showing no signs of letting up, despite frantic diplomatic efforts and mounting international criticism about the scope of Israel's military actions in Lebanon.

Question:
Do you approve or disapprove of the military action Israel has taken in Lebanon?

Choices:
Approve
Disapprove
Unsure

 

This message has been edited. Last edited by: TOW Gunner,

Nice to see so much consensus here, but really? After letting Hezbollah lob rockets into their country for so long, they think the Lebanon needs to be bombed back into the stone age now?

If this 'war on terror' thing didn't have so many peoples' heads screwed up (biggest gift the Israeli government ever received, that concept), the offensive against the Lebanon would be regarded as a war crime. Did Saddam ever commit such an act against another undefended country? He's on trial for crimes against his own people, and unfortunate enough not to be one of the foreign leaders whose crimes against their own we turn a blind to, but for overkill, he can't touch Israel...

Personnally I am tired of all the shit goin on over there. Too many lives being lost, and if a prevoked Israel helps take out some of the muslim fanatics, so be it. More power to 'em

I am in favour of isreal's military actions in Lebanon.

All the asswipe islamists in the Middle East claim that they would stop attacking isreal, if they recieved land from Isreal.
Now, that Isreal gave land to the muslims, they simply fired missiles at Isreal from this land.

Isreal has been patient for long enoguh ow, and I say they should re-invade Palistine and Lebanon, and do the world a favour by breaking the neck these damn terrorist organisations.

Oh, and on a last note, they should not bomb Iran and Syria back to the Stone age, they should nuke them back to the pre-cambrian era, because Iran and Syria are the bastards who supply terrorists with weapons.