According to news reports Obama said that the US should reserve the right to invade Pakistan if it believes Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf is failing to do enough to stop the terrorists. He said "I will not hesitate to use military force to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to America."

Surely, Obama must be congratulated in his efforts to use laughter as a new weapon against the terrorists. Every terrorists-wannabe with an IQ higher than a canoli knows full well that Obama is a card-carrying member of the Left Wing of America. They know that his party (as well as his advisers -- most of whom being San Francisco Democrats)would NEVER support his use of military force against Pakistan no matter how compelling the justification. Even if, as president, he successfully made a case for military action and by some Act of God persuaded the members of the Democratic Party to support his decision to go to war, there is not a single terrorist who would fail to realize that by holding out against the infidel invaders, the "Cut and Run" Left Wing of Obama's political base would take to the streets in protest. US withdrawal and defeat would be inevitable.

Obama is no dummy. He knows that as president he would have ZERO credibility in threatening the use of military force against Pakistan or any other place where terrorists hide. If anything, it is more likely that as president his Left Wing "Blame America First" instincts would cause him to issue public apologies to the Islamic Radicals in the Middle East because of US policies as applied to that region. So, this leaves us with two conclusions: Either Obama is a complete fraud who will say anything to win an election based on lies and a deceitful effort to pander to mainstream Americans or he is to be congratulated for inventing a new weapon against the terrorists: laughter. Perhaps he thinks that by making these public statements, he hopes that he will cause the terrorists in Pakistan to get heart attacks from laughing so much and (hopefully) dying as a result.

Between these two choices, I doubt very much that his efforts to create a new kind of weapon (death by laughter) will be successful. This leaves me with the other choice.

Any one out there who thinks otherwise?