|
U.S. Marine Corps Forums Also see: Marine Corps News |
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
![]() Location: Arizona
Registered: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1505
|
Good article, sorry, have to copy and paste, no link sent to me:
Sea Power September 2005 Hearts and Minds Marine Civil Affairs Groups take on a larger role in Iraq as U.S. forces vie with insurgents for loyalties of the local population By SUE A. LACKEY, Associate Editor FALLUJAH, Iraq - In a drab building surrounded by sandbags in the heart of Fallujah, a room is filled with Iraqis filing claims for reparations. Marine Corps interpreters are surrounded by groups of Iraqi men requesting assistance, and rows of benches are filled with black-robed women and hushed children. A 10-year-old girl, missing four fingers and her face disfigured with burns, waits patiently with her mother, hoping to get advanced medical care. Next to her, a lovely young mother, her voice devoid of expression, describes how her 8-month-old baby was killed in the bombing that injured her daughter and her husband has not been right since the explosions destroyed their home. Despite the constant threat of insurgent retaliation against them, these Iraqi citizens have come to the Civil Military Operations Center (CMOC) in Fallujah hoping that the 5th Marine Civil Affairs Group (CAG) will help them rebuild their lives. In the heart of what was once the most notorious insurgent stronghold in Iraq, CMOC has now become a model for joint efforts aimed at winning the hearts and minds of the local population throughout the country. Joining Marine CAGs in the effort are Army contractors and civil affairs units, Air Force personnel and Navy Seabees. Unlike the long-term peacekeeping roles usually associated with the Army, the role of the CAGs is to provide an immediate base of aid and relief in order to help stabilize the Marines' area of operations. Central to Marine urban combat doctrine is the concept of the "three-block war:" direct combat in block one, security and stabilization in block two, and civil affairs and humanitarian aid in block three. Former Marine Corps Commandant Charles C. Krulak defined the concept, postulating that in addition to providing aid, the civil affairs groups would ensure fighting units had their rear flank covered, and the local population could be converted to supporters and intelligence assets of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. That force coordination is vital in urban insurgencies, where the battlespace is fluid and enemies are often indistinguishable from noncombatants. "Detachment 4/4 was right there with them during the takedown of Fallujah," said Maj. Jeffrey Lipson of the 4th CAG. "There was combat two blocks away. Three days into major fighting, our Marines were setting up civil operations. The integration of force protection as well as the ability of humanitarian assistance creates a win-win situation for the Marines. From a military perspective, we have helicopters and resources a nongovernmental organization might not have." But as ground operations in Iraq stretch into a third year, the Marine Corps has added two provisional CAGs into its normal rotation of four permanent civil affairs groups. The CAGs are composed entirely of reservists who are rigorously selected for civilian expertise outside the normal skillsets of active duty Marines, such as advanced engineering, linguistic and cultural ability, and legal and governmental affairs. Far from being "weekend warriors," CAG Marines are expected to be trained to Marine rifleman standards, and to play an integral role in the planning and execution of combat operations. In a combat zone, even providing basic aid is challenging - and dangerous. Approximately 10 percent of 4th CAG Marines received the Purple Heart in the battle for Fallujah, and the 5th CAG has already lost one officer since it assumed the post in March. In the midst of combat, Civil Affairs Marines had to assess damage and impose curfews, as well as provide immediate humanitarian relief before long-term reconstruction could begin. Joined by Army personnel, the job expanded in ways they had not foreseen. "One of the major concerns of the international press was [the possibility] that we had a major humanitarian crisis brewing, primarily because the Iraqi Red Crescent Society starting publicizing reports [about lack of food and medicine] before they had ever entered the city," said U.S. Army Maj. James Orbock, 445th Civil Affairs Battalion commander. "We also anticipated using local contractors for body removal of civilian casualties, but the [insurgents] started booby-trapping bodies and the civilians did not want to [do the job]. So we had to implement a remains removal program. As the animals starting running out of pet food, they started eating the bodies, and as we started removing the bodies, they started looking at us as the source of their next meal. So then we had to start [controlling] the dogs and cats." CAGs have cleared rubble, rebuilt schools, paid property claims, helped restore electricity and water utilities, and distributed school supplies and soccer balls. And the efforts have paid off. "The battle for Fallujah [Operation Al Fajr] changed a lot of things. It really broke the back of the insurgency in Fallujah, and they never regained the combat potential they had," Lipson said. "In August 2004, every time we went out we got attacked, and they were raining mortars and rockets on the base every day. By the time we left in March 2005, we were able to go out among the people and rebuild schools, and the villagers were starting to call us and tell us about insurgents." Lt. Col. Bill Brown, then-director of the CMOC, agrees. "The way to defeat an insurgency is getting the people to believe in what you're doing. That's one of the reasons we're here," he said. "It's been a part of Marine Corps planning for a very long time, and we're getting more and more important to the Marine Expeditionary Force. "The people of Fallujah have had enough of the insurgents, and the people of this city are the ones who are going to defeat them in the long run. They feel they can trust us now, and they feel safe with us. Hundreds of people come here every day because they feel safe, and a lot of that is the work of civil affairs Marines," he said. Despite the notable successes in Fallujah, the expansion of CAG duties has the Marine Corps hierarchy uneasy over assuming a role normally filled by the Army. The Army engages in full-spectrum civil military operations that also include pre-conflict operations. Army Civil Affairs has decades of experience in large post-conflict reconstruction efforts that require engineering, construction and governance teams. The Marine Corps, by virtue of its structure as an expeditionary force, limits its civil affairs to relief efforts that can be conducted during and immediately after hostilities. As the war in Iraq lengthens, CAGs find their missions blending into reconstruction efforts that normally are handled by the much greater resources of the Army. The Army civil affairs force contains more than 6,000 soldiers, 90 percent of whom are reservists. The Marine Corps has less than 10 percent of that number, and its forces are entirely reserve. Unlike the Corps, the Army civil affairs force is attached to U.S. Special Operations Command, where certain units can provide support to Army Special Forces, which specialize in long-term missions with indigenous peoples. The Secretary of Defense has indicated a desire to expand civil affairs training throughout the Army, and some security and stabilization training has been incorporated service-wide. The Marine Corps lacks the manpower to sustain such a broad role. Although the Marines' Small Wars Manual, compiled in 1940, is in part based on similar missions during the Philippine insurgency a century ago, the Corps remains leery of peacekeeping, with the memory of the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing ever-present. "There is a gap between what the traditional military does and what is called 'nation building.' The reason the Corps is being called on to do this is because there aren't any civilian entities that are currently capable," said Maj. Jason Johnston, spokesman for the commandant's office. "It's really a testament to the training and education that the Marine Corps gives its people that they are able to fill that function, but it's a leap to say we should not be involved in civil military operations. "The political-military infrastructure needs to take a look at how we transition from traditional warfare to fourth phase nation building, and who is best able to do it. The State Department is currently not in a position to do it, so the military is placed in that position," he said. Until Iraq is secure enough for civilian efforts, Marine CAGs struggle to build some sort of governance and rule of law in Fallujah. "It's a matter of sustainability," said Capt. Julianne Sohn of the 5th CAG. "In an expeditionary role you have that one snapshot in time where you have immediate impact [on peace and reconstruction]. But five years down the line, it's the Iraqis who have to be able to maintain that." The Marine Corps is currently studying its civil affairs capabilities, and no decision has been made as to whether the Corps will retain its expanded capabilities only for the present conflict, or incorporate them into the force. |
![]() Location: Among the Living
Registered: 13 August 2005
Posts: 276
|
Good read.
It seems that the Corps has the answer to the CA question. Let it stay with the Reserves.This way they do not use active duty assets as nation builders.CA would be a small part of the Marine mission The Army has the personnel for CA,being a much larger force,so the Corps can remain as PRIMARILY a 911 force. If you start getting involved in CA and other duties,it depletes the manpower from the Marines primary mission. IMHO that would not be a good thing. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. In practice, "he that is not with me is against me. " The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. George Orwell |
![]() Location: Arizona
Registered: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1505
|
Yeah, well, they SAY it is only in the Reserve. However, I spoke with a few of these guys a few years ago (1999?). He told me they might as well be active duty. There were so few of them back then, and a huge workload, that these guys "floated" from assignment to assignment and managed to stay on active duty "full time". I can only imagine the workload now...
The guys I talked with did not seem to mind this, they were making out financially (both Sgts I spoke with did not have "permanent day jobs") and preferred the way things were working out for them. I don't know if that's applicable across the board for these CA guys. |
![]() Location: Among the Living
Registered: 13 August 2005
Posts: 276
|
Well,duck,what do you think?
It seems to this old civilian that the Marines sometimes want too big a slice of pie. The Corps has limited resources,so do they branch out into fulltime CA or do they work piecemeal as they are doing now? I understand that CA is an integral part of warfare,I just don't think the Marine Corps budget can justify fewer combat related jobs and more CA slots. My.02 If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. In practice, "he that is not with me is against me. " The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. George Orwell |
![]() Location: Arizona
Registered: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1505
|
There are a few things you will never hear a Marine say:
"That can't be done." "We need help from...." "Money is no object..." "Of course we'd prefer...fire support over our organic capabilities." My guess is we'll keep trying to strap it together while it's in flight. Marines almost enjoy that. Two bonus things you'll never hear: "The politically correct thing to do is..." "Michael Moore is da bomb!" |
![]() Location: Among the Living
Registered: 13 August 2005
Posts: 276
|
That's why you are the Gunny.
Hope things are going well for you. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. In practice, "he that is not with me is against me. " The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. George Orwell |
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION:
MilitarySpot.com - Online Military Community and More! |

