Military  Military Forums

Home  |  Site Map

 

Open Discussions
    Military Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Military Discussions  Hop To Forums  Open Discussions    Do you think it is time for our government to negotiate with terrorist?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Picture of watchman
Registered: 29 June 2006
Posts: 195
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
British Lawmakers Say: Talk With Terrorists Confused

http://thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=article&id=3569

The Foreign Affairs Committee in Britain’s House of Commons recently recommended that the British government formally engage in direct talks with Hamas and Hezbollah, as well as the Egyptian Brotherhood. The report recommending these actions, titled “Global Security: The Middle East,” was released Monday.

Admitting that Hezbollah’s influence is “malign,” that Hamas is a recognized terrorist organization, and that the Egyptian Brotherhood has known connections to Hamas, the Foreign Affairs Committee report states that the influence of these groups is too strong to be ignored any longer.

Concerning Hamas: “Hamas is part of the fabric of Palestinian society and engaging with the movement is the only way to prevent radical elements within the movement side-lining more pragmatic moderates.” Regarding Hezbollah: “We conclude that Hezbollah is undeniably an important element in Lebanon’s politics, although its influence, along with Iran’s and Syria’s, continues to be a malign one. … [T]he government should encourage Hezbollah to play a part in Lebanon’s mainstream politics. We recommend that the government should engage directly with moderate Hezbollah parliamentarians.”

This report emerges at a time when Western nations are reviewing and revamping their approach to Middle Eastern politics. The Quartet on the Middle East, led by recently appointed envoy Tony Blair and consisting of the U.S., the EU, the UN and Russia, has already laid down ground rules for directly dealing with these organizations. One of the main stipulations before sitting down at the negotiating table is that they must first recognize Israel’s right to exist, which none of them currently do. Another is some sort of commitment to non-violence. Given Hamas’s coup in Gaza and Hezbollah’s massive and continuing re-armament, along with their ongoing history of every-day violence, meeting this requirement seems even less likely.

Despite the obvious reluctance of these terrorist groups to repent of their violent ways, the Foreign Affairs Committee suggests that London enter talks in an effort to try to coerce these terrorist organizations into recognizing Israel, and try to exclude the militant wings of Hamas and Hezbollah.

The committee reasons that the influence of these groups is so strong that diplomatic silence is no longer a viable option; such groups are the reality of the Middle East. After all, Hamas did win the popular vote in its latest elections, and the report says, “[I]t is important the Palestinian people are not punished for exercising their rights as voters.”

The report also mentions the influence of Syria and offers an opinion concerning the war in Iraq: “We conclude that it is too early to provide a definitive assessment of the U.S. ‘surge’ but that it does not look likely to succeed.”

Throughout the report, one nation is given special attention: Iran. “We conclude that Iran is rapidly increasing its influence and power across the Middle East. It has demonstrated that it is able to generate or exploit crises in a range of countries, thus furthering its own interests.” The report recognizes that Iran is behind, and profiting from, much of the instability in the Middle East.

While this report is merely a 200-plus-page suggestion for British policy and not an imperative, it is still a product of the dangerous thinking pervading many British leaders. That these politicians want to conduct direct talks with unrepentant terrorist groups reveals just how much ground the West has lost already. The Foreign Affairs Committee’s willingness to accept Hamas, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood reveals the weakness of Britain and the real strength of these terrorist organizations.

How long before Western nations realize that engaging terrorists with direct talks is not the solution to the crisis hitting the Middle East?
Picture of thegunny
Registered: 24 January 2005
Posts: 3895
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
well I think they have gotten to the point that if shooting them doesn't make them go away, then they will have to use the last resort and actually talk to them.


SEMPER FI
The Gunny

PROUD TO BE AN INFIDEL

America is not at war.
The Marines are at war, America is at the mall.
Picture of patoloco
Location: Arizona
Registered: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1996
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It's only going to confirm what they have already known since the Jews kicked the Brits out of Israel. Terrorism works. Especially in the Middle East. I think it's a slippery slope to engage in.

Many of the Marxist/Leninist/Maoist terrorist groups of the 60s and 70s failed, despite repeated successful attacks. Many feel the successful defeat of these groups was related to the fall of the Soviet Union (and the lack of funds that created). However, I think the lack of popular base from the people also had to contribute.

We need to do both to get rid of the Middle Eastern terrorist groups. Rid them of their funding (especially Saudi Arabia) and deny them their popular base. Easy to say, very difficult to do.
Picture of watchman
Registered: 29 June 2006
Posts: 195
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Terrorist believe only in violence to achieve their objectives. They only use negotiations to trick their enemies. Base on our very sad experience with regard to terrorist muslims in the Philippines, negotiations with terrorist do not work. Our government was stupid enough to give terrorist MNLF leader Nor Misuari billions of pesos to develop the livelihood of Muslim Mindanao. Instead he used the money to buy weapons & attacked the Philippine government. cuss
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

    Military Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Military Discussions  Hop To Forums  Open Discussions    Do you think it is time for our government to negotiate with terrorist?

DESCRIPTION: MilitarySpot.com - Online Military Community and More!
LINKS:
military - military loans - military shopping - military singles - pioneer military loans - va loans